|
|
Monsalvat: the Parsifal home page | Nietzsche on
Parsifal
|
||
This web-page will look much better in a browser that supports worldwide web standards although it is accessible to any browser. You appear to be using an older browser that does not support current standards. Please consider upgrading your browser.
riedrich Nietzsche had turned against the idol of his youth long before he
heard the Prelude to Parsifal for the first time in Monte-Carlo in January 1887.
Despite his apostasy, Nietzsche was greatly moved:
When I see you again, I shall tell you exactly what I then understood. Putting aside all irrelevant questions (to what end such music can or should serve?), and speaking from a purely aesthetic point of view, has Wagner ever written anything better? The supreme psychological perception and precision as regards what can be said, expressed, communicated here, the extreme of concision and directness of form, every nuance of feeling conveyed epigrammatically; a clarity of musical description that reminds us of a shield of consummate workmanship; and finally an extraordinary sublimity of feeling, something experienced in the very depths of music, that does Wagner the highest honour; a synthesis of conditions which to many people - even "higher minds" - will seem incompatible, of strict coherence, of "loftiness" in the most startling sense of the word, of a cognisance and a penetration of vision that cuts through the soul as with a knife, of sympathy with what is seen and shown forth. We get something comparable to it in Dante, but nowhere else. Has any painter ever depicted so sorrowful a look of love as Wagner does in the final accents of his Prelude?
![]()
![]() |
|
|
|
Nietzsche's objection to Wagner preaching chastity might have been motivated partly by
envy; since Nietzsche (right) was famously unsuccessful with women. In this photograph
it is Lou Salome (left) who is holding the whip.
|