-- PLEASE HELP PAUL

SILJE

 

 

INNOCENT ON DEATH ROW IN FLORIDA

 

WILL JUSTICE SURVIVE?

 

READ THE LATEST FROM FLORIDA SUPREME COURT 7 TH JANUARY 1998.

 

 

READ THE LAWYERS APPEAL.

 

MR. SCOTT`s RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION WERE VIOLATED BY THE
PARTICIPATION OF ASSISTENT STATE ATTORNEY,
KEN SELVIG, AS COUNSEL FOR THE STATE, BECAUSE MR. SELVIG WAS A NECESSARY AND MATERIAL WITNESS WHO HAD A PERSONAL STAKE IN THE OUTCOME AND
ALLOWED THAT PERSONAL STAKE TO CLOUD HIS
JUDGMENT AND VIOLATE THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL
CONDUCT TO MR. SCOTTS PREJUDICE.

 

 

JUDGE MOUNTS ERRONEOUSLY FAILED TO DISQUALIFY HIMSELF.

 

 

MR.SCOTT WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS, AND A FULL AND FAIR HEARING ON HIS MOTION TO VACATE THE CIRCUIT COURT, AND THE STATE VIOLATED MR. SCOTTS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND A FULL AND FAIR HEARING BY DEPRIVING MR. SCOTT OF COMPETENT AND EFFECTIVE
COUNSEL WHEN THEY SET MR. SCOTTS EVIDENTIARY
HEARING AT A TIME WHEN THEY KNEW MR. SCOTTS COUNSEL COULD NOT ATTEND AND HIS WITNESSES COULD NOT BE PRESENT.

 

 

THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO ENSURE MR. SCOTTS PRESENS DURING CRITICAL
STAGES OF HIS POSTCONVICTION HEARING, AND AS A RESULT MR. SCOTTS RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS WERE
VIOLATED.

 

 

JUDGE MOUNTS ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED MR. SCOTTS REQUEST UNDER RULE 3. 190 TO DEPOSE DEXTER COFFIN AND ROBERT DIXON.

 

 

 

JUDGE MOUNTS IMPROPERLY OVERRULED THIS COURT
WHEN, IN DISREGARD OF THE OPINION REMANDING FOR
AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; HE EXCLUDED AND REFUSED
TO LET MR. SCOTT PRESENT THE EVIDENCE OF WHICH THIS COURT HAS HELD AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING WAS
REQUIRED.

 

 

FILE 2 - LAWYERS REPLY BRIEF

 

FILE 3 - THE STATE

 

 

 

WILL PAUL WILLIAM SCOTT GET A NEW FAIR AND FULL HEARING?

 

Read the ruling of the Supreme Court of Florida.