|
Station plans Delays Enormous costs Dangerous spacewalks Less contributions |
|
With the situation in Russia, Boeing going 800 million over budget and the money spent planning the station under Ronald Reagan, the station comes to much more than first estimated 17,4 billion and I am sure that the figures will rise even further. The figures does not include the 28-38 shuttle launches, Russian Proton, soyuz and Progress launches over the years. Each shuttle launch costs about 420 million and including the station maintenance during it's life time it is expected that the station could end up with a total price tag of 96 billion. That means that NASA will be spending 1/7 of it's budget on the ISS.
As the contributions to Russia is soaring, Russia's contribution to the station is declining. The core program of Russia no longer includes a science power platform, 2 research laboratories and a life-support module. Russia is talking with Ukrain about constructing a laboratory together but it is not yet clear if this will happen. The Life-support module is now redundant due to modifications and changing design of other modules. Status of other modules are unclear. Russia will probably also be unable to provide all the Progress and Soyuz flights promised
Several years ago it was estimated that it would take some 80 spacewalks to complete the station in orbit. Because of this the project was almost killed in congress. To prevent pulling the plug on the project, NASA promised to change the number. They managed to change it but in the wrong direction, it is now up to 162 spacewalks. Many want to kill the ISS project, but because of all the money spent, the already begun construction of the station and the political aspects. Giving it the boot would mean canceling contracts in California, Texas, Florida, Virgina, and in the other countries participating. It would be bad for politics to give up the project. I am sure the station will run into many more delays, budget overruns and other problems but it will go up. There is no way turning back.
Russias contributions will probably be less than shown on the pictures